Neural Workflow Revisited (or Regurgitated)

Many moons ago I wrote an article on neural workflow.  The concept of taking a neural net approach and adopted it to business processes instead of how they are currently done which is more of a source sink based concept.  I have thought a little bit more about the concept and I thought I would share my thoughts. 

First businesses gain a lot by having systems that help automate and manage their source/sink based processes however businesses are more then the sum of their processes.  If you were to draw a directed graph of communication or the flow of information within an organization it would look a lot like a neural network.  Workflow / BPM as it becomes more advanced is moving away from merely trying to automate ‘Standard Processes’ to automating larger, more dynamic and disorganized processes.   

When you start to embed workflows within multiple other workflows you are starting to create a kind of neural net.  Although I have never had a hand in creating a workflow A, which creates an instance of workflow B, which in turn creates a new instance of workflow A I can envisage many instances where this may be required.  I am sure one if not more tools can already handle these kinds of scenarios, but are they effectively communicating the overlaying structure to designers in an easy to understand way? 

How do we learn to speak neural net as opposed to flow chart?

Well the current tools / Notations / Standards for expressing neural nets are not as easy to work with as with sources as sinks.  Source Sinks can usually be read top to bottom or left to right.  Even the most complex processes can usually be mapped onto a two dimensional piece of paper.  With Neural nets it’s a lot more difficult.  There are just too many interconnections and not enough and there isn’t a side of the page for sources and one side of the page where the sinks are suppose to be.  Maybe we need some sort of 3 dimensional structures.    

I believe ‘neuralness’ is the way forward as businesses are neural entities and not just a series processes.  The challenge for workflow will be to deliver easy to understand solutions for these problems. 

..Yet again I ramble.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Neural Workflow Revisited (or Regurgitated)

  1. Do you think you need neural workflow or just the ability to embed neural networks and other kinds of sophisticated analytics into decision-making nodes within workflow? True, some workflows really are disorganized but most have some finite set of flow options and what is complex is deciding which one(s) to use. Approaching decisioning as separate from workflow might help in many of these cases.
    See http://edmblog.fairisaac.com/weblog/2006/04/analytics_and_b.html for some ideas on bringing analytics into processes and this section http://edmblog.fairisaac.com/weblog/business_process_management/index.html for more general stuff on BPM and rules.

  2. Pingback: processi » Blog Archive » Le peuple des connecteurs

  3. James: I guess what I am trying to get at is not so much the concept of a business having a series of workflows but a business having a series of interconnected workflows such that the analysis of the entire process of running the organisation has a neural feel

    as for the book it sounds interesting I will have to check it out.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s